Mr. Congressman

The election’s over, and most folks are busily trying to clean up the trash and wreckage that inevitably follows. A good many loosing candidates are sitting around trying to figure out what went wrong, while an equal number of winning candidates are trying to figure out what went right I would suspect. At any rate, there are a lot of folks that were “to busy to get involved” that are now sitting around and wondering just what happened. At any rate, most of us are picking up the assorted “vote for me” signs that clutter our yards, tossing out the excess campaign literature cluttering the place, and thinking “Thank God that’s over”! The politico’s on the other hand (winners and losers alike), are busily thanking their supporters, and starting the planning sessions for the next campaign. I don’t see anything wrong with all this, remembering that it’s been part of the American political scene for the last couple of hundred years. As part of the “thank you” notes passed about I received the following e-mail from Idaho's Sen. Mike Crappo. I think it’s a form letter, as I’m sure that Mike wouldn’t remember talking to me in the past. (Funny, Larry Craig did remember speaking to me previously, on several occasions. Must have been my ugly mug that he remembered.) Anyway, Mike’s note went as follows:

Dear Robert,

Thank you for your help in our success on Election Day! Your active role in my campaign for the U.S. Senate was a big part of why I was able to win the election.

All across America, voters demanded a return to the bedrock conservative principles of limited government, lower taxes, less spending and the preservation of our Constitutional freedoms.

America is the greatest country in the world. We will get her on the right track by working together.

I can't thank you enough for your support of my campaign. I will continue to work hard for Idahoans to ensure America has a limited government and unlimited opportunity.

Thanks!

So Mike, you’re quite welcome even though I didn’t do anything to promote your campaign except grind my teeth at the Obama crowd, but I’m pleased that you won. However, as you look forward to the next six years on the hill, don’t forget why you’re there. Idaho has spoken… Or more accurately, we’ve shouted at Washington that we’ve had quite enough wasteful spending, enough over-regulation, enough vote trading, enough bills that “spread the wealth”, and certainly enough undermining the foundations of our free country. Keep in mind that Harry Reid still suffers from his “god complex”, as the morning after the election he clearly stated that tax cuts “aren’t going to happen”. Perhaps, perhaps not, but we didn’t send you back to the Senate to cooperate or negotiate with either Harry or Mr. Obama on the subject of taxes or spending. Stick to “our” guns, and if the Democrats want to call you guys the “Party of No”, so be it. I for one would rather see the forecast congressional gridlock occur, rather than see Mr. O’s plan to change America go even one step further. I’ll guess that in two years Mr. O will find out the hard way just what most Americans think of his changes, and so will another batch of congressmen who support him!

Nothing in today’s world ranks lower in the public’s esteem than Congress, and you guys are going to have to work overtime turning that around. One on-line news story came up with a pretty good list of things the new Congress might do to win the confidence of Americans, and I’d suggest that the entire Idaho delegation seriously consider them. Some of those suggestions included federal term limits, rescinding ObamaCare, reining in the EPA, and the creation of a bipartisan congressional committee to streamline the government. To those, I’ll add cleaning up the mess Homeland Security is making of our Constitutional rights, straighten out the immigration / illegal alien situation, and rewrite the Endangered Species Act. These are my suggested starting points, and while not everyone will agree with them some common sense changes will at least reassure the American public that they are once again in charge. That’s a pretty full plate I’ll agree, and while I wouldn’t expect to see it all happen in two short years, I would expect to see progress between now and 2012. So guys, don’t just talk about it, DO IT!

With the elections over, a lame-duck Congress comes back to deal with a lot of unfinished business, and the question here is how much they'll get done. Such sessions tend to be unproductive as the losers are in a bad mood and just want to go home; while the winners prefer to wait until their reinforcements arrive in January. But for the moment the Democrats still command a big majority. Mr. O said he would invite both Democratic and GOP leaders to the White House later this month to negotiate, but were I a Republican congressman, I’d remember that as the party in control for the past few years, the Democrats weren’t at all interested in negotiations, instead preferring to enact their legislation despite the stated wishes of the electorate. I don’t really expect to see that policy change over the next few weeks, and a defeated Democratic Congress could use its remaining weeks of post-election power to vote in even more of Barrack Obama's agenda for a "fundamental transformation" of America, particularly with a somewhat vindictive team of Harry and Nancy running the show.

The current Congress returns to a lot of taxing and spending issues, both dear to the Democratic heart. Both parties are ready to address the expiration of Bush-era tax cuts on Dec. 31, and none of the 12 current spending bills have passed. Some lawmakers are planning to wrap those 12 spending bills into yet another massive $1.1 trillion catchall bill, and I’d expect to see them include a lot of favored earmarks and pork projects included as well. But they might also consider that the voters did send a message in the election, and some congressmen heard it. The message? "We don't have a revenue problem. We have a spending problem." Sen.-elect Rand Paul suggested reducing the size of government, freezing federal hiring, and reducing the federal payroll by 10 percent. "The average federal employee makes $120,000 a year. The average private employee makes $60,000 a year. Let's get them more in line, and let's find savings."

I and many others can agree with him Mike, so perhaps you guys on the hill should seriously consider doing just that, starting with a lot of overpaid elected officials!